Friday, July 27, 2007

Agriculture Canada shuts down new turbines - CBC

A $200,000 wind turbine installed at an Agriculture Canada research station on P.E.I. has been shut down because of complaints it's too noisy.

The turbine was installed to provide green energy to the research station in Harrington, north of Charlottetown, but operated for only two days before it was shut down for good.

"We had a call from a neighbour complaining about the noise and that it caused ill health to them," said Mike Hennigar of Agriculture Canada, "so we made the decision to turn it off and further investigate what exactly was going on with it."

The neighbour was complaining of migraine headaches.

Agriculture Canada tested the noise at the foot of the tower with a decibel meter and measured 62 dB in high winds, a level of sound somewhere between a clothes dryer and a washing machine.

The department had an environmental assessment done before the 30-metre high, three-blade turbine was installed. The consultant said the location of the turbine, 300 metres from the road and 400 metres from the nearest house, should not cause any problem.

Hennigar said Agriculture Canada is considering relocating the turbine, which would cost about $120,000, or perhaps selling it. He said it would not be operating again at its current location.

Story from CBC http://www.cbc.ca/canada/prince-edward-island/story/2007/07/27/agriculture-wind.html

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Strong local opposition

With all the recent media buzz over a proposed wind energy project in the Pugwash/Gulf Shore area, it seems strange that this has not engendered howls of protest from the other dozen or more areas in Nova Scotia where similar projects are being developed.

There are a couple of reasons why this could be. The local residents may not be aware of a potential project or there are no nearby residents to complain. I suggest the latter is the more likely scenario. That is: that these projects are more appropriately located, away from populated areas.

The wind energy project in Pugwash would impact hundreds of year round and seasonal residents. These people come here to live, play and retire for the peace, quiet and beauty of the area.

A petition signed by over 500 people makes it very clear that there is strong opposition to this project.

What does it take for the proponent to understand that this opposition and bad press over this project could harm future wind energy projects in this province?

Monday, July 23, 2007

Elmira, PEI

Visit to Elmira PEI, a Vestas Wind Farm, and with Dwayne and Kevin Bailey

On July 20, 2007 Ruth & I decided to drive from the Gulf Shore to Elmira, which is on the northeastern tip of PEI, to visit with Dwayne Bailey and his father, Kevin, and view the new local wind farm. Both abandoned their lifelong homes because they could not tolerate the noise from this facility.

The Elmira wind farm uses Vestas V90 turbines. Each is approximately 120 meters high with blade diameters of 90 meters, average rotational speed of 16 rpm and power outputs of three megawatts each. Vestas turbines were used at Pubnico, and are also proposed for the Gulf Shore. Initial plans here were for 30 turbines, so far 10 have been placed. This could be the first of several proposed projects along the northeast shore.


View of Wind Farm From the Bailey’s Farm


We met Dwayne and Kevin at their old homes in Elmira. Their farm is across the road from the wind turbines, about 1 km away. This is traditional farmland with fields and scattered woodlands. Their farm was set on a slight hill rising from the road to the fields behind the homes. The Baileys are lobster fishermen who rent their farmland out for crops “so that the weeds do not take over the place”. Dwayne is a volunteer firefighter as well.


Dwayne reported that the wind farm was a PEI Provincial Government project. There were two initial community information meetings. Approximately $40,000 was offered for a community centre, and bonds were issued for those residents who wanted to invest in the project.

He said that a transmission line was constructed from Souris to take the power from these and other proposed turbines to the Maritime Electric Power grid. The plant was operational February 2007. Except for some basic construction and excavation work, plus crane work by Irving, Vestas did the majority of the installation. The site now has two to four employees. There was very little local employment as a result of this project.

Breakdowns and repairs were common. It was rare to have all 10 turbines working together. Dwayne stated that a few months ago, a portion of a rotor flew off one of the turbines and landed on a company vehicle’s hood.


Bailey Farm, Elmira, PEI


When we first drove into their yard, our initial impression was that their one kilometer setback distance should be fine. However, their problems began within weeks after the turbines started operating. When they were downwind from the turbines, and the air was moving just enough to turn them, (12-15 knots from the northeast), the noise was loud. It was a repetitive modulated drone of sound. Dwayne and Kevin both claimed it sometimes was loud enough to rattle the windows of their homes. The sound was even worse in the field behind their homes. Distances from 1 to 1.5 kilometers were the areas of the most annoying sounds. This spring the winds created constant misery.

Dwayne developed headaches, popping and ringing ears, and could not sleep. He tried new glasses, prescription sleep aids and earplugs, to no avail.

Dwayne’s two year old was sleeping well prior to the wind farm, but began waking up, 5-6 times a night.

Kevin Bailey stated, “When you are outside working and absorbed in what you are doing, you are OK. If inside, resting or reading, it’s a problem. Forget about sleeping at night. The repetitions would go away, you think that it is gone, and it comes back again.” Kevin tried sound dampening by draping the front walls inside his house, and sleeping in the back, but this did not work.

Kevin had problems with his electrical appliances. The fridge, water heater and power meter all vibrated. He purchased a new fridge, and it was just as bad. When the fridge was moved to the new house, the vibrations were gone.

They complained to the province and the municipality, but no one would take them seriously. One official suggested it was too quiet there which is a funny kind of problem to have. There was not enough ambient background noise to block out the sound.

Both families moved two weeks ago and they are feeling better. “We had to move back into town to get away from the noise.”

They could not in all good conscience sell the homes, but if they did, they felt new purchasers would soon be demanding their money back.

Dwayne said, “We have had six generations of little feet running through the grass, but now that is gone.”

Kevin noted, “All we ever had here was peace and quiet, and poverty. Now we only have poverty.”



Vestas V90 WindFarm, Elmira, PEI



We toured the wind farm site. Initially the winds were 12-14 knots. Downwind at 500 meters there was a loud rhythmic whooshing sound coming from each of the turbines that could be easily identified with their rotation. At least three or four turbines could be heard at once. The sounds were out of sync and confused. At 300 meters each turbine was very noisy from any
direction. There is absolutely no way you could live next to a turbine at this distance. We stood at the base. There were many sounds. Electrical high pitched humming, the deep whoosh of the sails or rotors as they sweep past every 5 seconds, a steady swish of the rotor tips, which are cutting through the air at 240 kilometers per hour. When the wind changed, the rotors made a sound like a jet engine taking off, until they were in position again.

Wind Farm with Ruth at Turbine Base

Within 300 meters, the towers and blades were incredibly imposing. Not something you would want to be around, or see. Looking up and watching the blades spin, hearing all the noise, was frightening. In winter ice throw anywhere within range of these units would be a huge concern. Dwayne had told us that the fire department was warned that in winter if they were required, they were to be very careful where they parked.

We went 1 km downwind and the loud rhythmic sounds could be heard from various turbines at different speeds, again, all out of sync with each other. A curiosity for a few minutes, but you could never live with this noise.

The wind picked up to about 18-20 knots and when downwind 700 meters to 1.5 km away, standing outside, you could not hear the noise. However, inside our car with the window down and out of the turbulence of the outside air the sounds returned.

Wind Farm from three kilometers away


Wind turbine setback bylaws for Cumberland County are clearly inadequate for protection of the rights of residents who will be living adjacent to wind turbines. They desperately need to be re-examined and amended.

Paul and Ruth Downing


Quote from Dr Nina Pierpont, MD, PhD

"I am a physician and scientist; my expertise lies in clinical and environmental matters. Whether or not wind proves to be a viable source of power, it is absolutely essential that windmills not be sited any closer than 1.5 miles from people's homes or anywhere else people regularly congregate. (Highways are also a problem for motorists with seizure and migraine disorders and motion sensitivity, from the huge spinning blades and landscape-sweeping shadow flicker.) I consider a 1.5 mile set-back a minimum figure. In hilly or mountainous topographies, where valleys act as natural channels for noise, this 1.5 mile set-back should be extended anywhere from 2-3 miles from homes.

"Let me be clear: there is nothing, absolutely nothing, in the wind energy proposition that says windmills must be sited next door (often 1000 feet) to people's homes and workplaces. Siting, after all, is the crux of the issue.

"Irresponsible siting is what most of the uproar is about. Corporate economics favor building wind turbines in people's backyards; sound clinical medicine, however, does not."

http://www.ninapierpont.com/?s=wind&p=2

Sunday, July 22, 2007

report for CanWEA

Suggested information sent in by Cobequid Area Wind farms: here are two reports made for the Canadian Wind Energy Association and conducted by Howe Gastmeier Chapnik Ltd (HGC)

Report on Infrasound, published November 29 2006
http://www.canwea.ca/images/uploads/File/CanWEA_Infrasound_Study_Final.pdf

This report acknowledges that infrasound is produced by turbines, but human health is not affected. There are many reports to dispute this assertion:
http://www.icsv12.ist.utl.pt/papers/session.php?id=10
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10189173&dopt=Citation
http://kirbymtn.blogspot.com/2006/04/vibroacoustic-disease-and-wind.html

Best practice guidelines, published February 14th 2007
http://www.canwea.ca/images/uploads/File/CanWEA_Wind_Turbine_Sound_Study_-_Final.pdf

Note pages 14 and 15 in Review of Canadian Experience when it is suggested that complaints from noise are much reduced if setbacks are at 1000m or more.

AWPC/CAWF is proposing to be only 500m away from our homes.

The report also talks about how good public relations are essential.

Ahem!

Friday, July 20, 2007

more video and reports

Cobequid Wind Farms asked me to post some more video links and .pdf files. This process will take a while, because I want to preview them, and all we have here is dial-up.

Here's the first one (19MB):

Maple Ridge in New York - the largest wind farm in New York with 120 turbines (Wikipedia). This is located in primarily agricultural land. No cottages to be seen anywhere!
http://www.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/windpoweringamerica/filter_detail.asp?itemid=1211

More information about this same project:
http://www.wind-watch.org/news/2007/05/30/study-shows-hundreds-of-dead-birds-bats-at-wind-turbines/

http://www.windaction.org/pictures/482

Required viewing

Anyone who had any doubts before that wind turbines should not be located too close to residential areas should watch the videos listed below.

Pennsylvania and New York (approx 24 minutes)
Texas (approx 3.5 minutes)

Australia (approx 10 minutes)

Lincolnshire, England (approx 15 minutes)

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Comments

As much as I enjoy many of the comments on this blog, I am disturbed that some people see this as an opportunity to make personal attacks, some quite libelous. Not just towards me, but towards my friends and neighbours who nevertheless see these comments for what they are.

It is clear that these are comments from a particular group who see this open forum as a threat to their wind energy interests.

The more rabid, outrageous and threatening they are, the more foolish and desperate they look.

I simply do not have time to moderate discussion, so if this goes too off track, I will simply have to shut down the comments section - as I did some months ago for the same reasons.

I could pick and chose which comments to keep, but I'd rather not get involved in the slippery slope of censorship - its all or nothing.

This blog was started up to introduce all kinds of information to educate and question, and that will continue regardless.

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Wind Turbine Development - Gulf Shore Road, Pugwash , NS Petition

Online petitions are all the rage now. Get in on the action.

You don't have to have your e-mail address seen. Comments are welcome. This is a petition against this particular wind farm location. It is not against wind energy.

Wind Turbine Development - Gulf Shore Road, Pugwash , NS Petition

Monday, July 16, 2007

Recuitment?

There seems to be some confusion as to the intelligence and integrity of the local population.

It has been suggested in the press by certain people and in some comments here that locals and cottagers have been led by a small group of weirdos into believing wind energy is bad and that they must oppose a proposed wind farm here.

It seems extraordinary that hundreds of people - including lawyers, doctors, dentists, judges, leaders of industry, teachers, RCMP officers, business owners and regular joes have been somehow hypnotized into believing in this one cause.

Give me a break!!

These are intelligent, educated people who can make up their own minds!

No one here has ever said that wind energy is bad.

The suggestion that we only care about what is immediately on our own doorstep is also insulting. We understand that what happens locally affects us all - locally. Just because someone speaking in opposition is more than two kilometers away does not mean that they do not have a concern.

These people can see the bigger picture.

Clair Peers is quoted in a recent Canada.com story by CanWest News as saying the Gulf Shore Association knew (Anne) Murray had a cottage nearby and likely recruited her in their battle against the project. "It's probably a clever tactic to get someone famous involved. It's been an ongoing thing."

Recruitment? There's been no necessity for any recruitment because Anne and the hundreds of others that oppose this particular project needed no recruitment. They have made informed, educated decisions all by themselves. We have been approached by them.

Sunday, July 15, 2007

Letter to Premier Rodney MacDonald

Dear Mr MacDonald,

As I am sure you are aware there is growing concern and opposition over the issue of a proposed wind energy project in the Pugwash/Gulf Shore area.

As I am sure you noticed while you were here for the Pugwash Peace Exchange last weekend, this is a beautiful and peaceful area. Indeed, Cyrus Eaton invited the original conference attendees here 50 years ago just because of the peace and quiet Pugwash has to offer.

This is quite blatantly the wrong location for such a project and I am afraid that the longer the prospect of this project remains, the louder the opposition it will garner. This is not good for the wind energy industry. Other proponents are deeply concerned that their own, responsible projects will suffer from poor public support as a repercussion of what is going on here.

I would ask the Nova Scotia Government to take a serious, long, hard look at this whole industry and take some leadership by declaring the minimum standards by which wind energy projects must abide. A responsible, intelligent set of standards could set the way for the rest of the country! Use the experience of those who have had turbines for decades and learn from their mistakes.

Blindly surging ahead into wind energy without considering health and safety factors and reasonable enjoyment of a resident's property is not looking after your constituents - the people of Nova Scotia.

Currently there are guidelines as suggested by the Dept of Environment and Labour, but they are just that, guidelines. Given the fact that environmental assessments are conducted by firms that are paid by the proponents, these guidelines are way too easily potentially bent towards the benefit of the paying customer - the wind energy company.

These minimum standards should apply to current land use, for example protecting areas of outstanding beauty (Peggy's Cove), and for preserving current land use (tourist/recreation/retirement/residential areas such as ours). These standards should also include a well researched setback for turbines. These should apply differently for differently used areas, depending on the current land use. Setbacks for residential areas would not be necessarily the same as it would be for industrial areas.

There is growing medical evidence that turbines are affecting the health of people living nearby. In our own province a family of 6 has had to move out of their beautiful home in Pubnico and there are residents near other turbines in Brookfield and Marshville who are trying to sell their homes to get away from the noise and disturbance. Two families in Elmira, PEI abandoned their home two weeks ago for the same reasons.

Please do not allow the current guidelines to allow for turbines to be located too close to us and affect our health and our reasonable enjoyment of our properties. The people of Nova Scotia should be protected by our government, not exploited by it.

Please err on the side of caution and call a moratorium of all wind power developments that are any closer than 2km of a residence until independent and government research has been done to establish the safe and healthy distance from a turbine people should be living. This distance may not be the same as for work places, depending on the number of hours a day a person is exposed to the noise, vibrations and infrasound of a turbine, or even more so, multiple turbines.

These projects don't just affect the health of Nova Scotians but their economic development, tourism and environment generally. These Departments need to work together on these standards so that they work in concert, not in conflict.

Renewable energy should be encouraged in every way, but it has to be conducted in a responsible and intelligent manner that benefits ALL the people of Nova Scotia in all respects.

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Media noise

Thank you Anne Murray for your support!

Thank you to the hundreds of others who have also voiced their support in trying to preserve this beautiful, peaceful area.

Maybe some of the media interest spurred by Ms Murray's comments will help AWPC (and their subsidiary Cobequid Area Wind Farms [CAWF]) to finally understand that there is considerable opposition to this proposed project. There is no small voice of just a few people here, the entire Shore is in opposition.

I will say this again until I am blue in the face - we are NOT OPPOSED TO GREEN ENERGY!!


However, these projects have to be located in a responsible manner. They have to go where the local people will not be disturbed or made sick by these behemoths.

On Elmira, PEI two homes have just been abandoned by their owners because they were being made sick by the new turbines that went up earlier this year. These turbines are the same Vestas turbines used in Pubnico and proposed for the Gulf Shore. Their doctor recommended that they spend as little time as possible at home. They were experiencing headaches, ringing in their ears, dizziness and disturbed sleep. This has happened to people who were 1km from the turbines. This is a farm of currently 10 turbines. There are more planned. They were able to move away because they could afford to do it. Their neighbours are not able to afford to move away.

As we know, the d'Entremonts abandoned their home in Pubnico for the same reasons some time ago.

And AWPC/CAWP wants to bring 27 of the same industrial sized machines to within 500m of our homes (or 0m from a property line)!

The idea of someone coming into my neighbourhood, uninvited and unwanted, deliberately erecting industrial sized (400') machines that will make us sick is unconscionable!! We will not be railroaded.

As one comment on an earlier posting says: this opposition will not end. There will just be more and more of us.

The longer this project is proposed, the more difficult questions for the industry in general are being raised - this is bad media for the industry.
The sooner the plug is pulled on this particular project the better it will be for for the wind energy industry in general.

It is all very well to suggest going to Pubnico to view the turbines (which some of our group has done and agree they are noisy) - what about coming up here to the Shore and admire it for its beauty and tranquility?

It would be a very inefficient use of gasoline to drive 5 hours one way just to look at some turbines in Pubnico when we could drive 1.5 hours to Elmira and look at the same machines! Let's be energy efficient here!

Charles told us himself at the Pugwash Chamber of Commerce meeting, NS Power can only use the power from about 200 turbines. This is because wind energy cannot, currently, be stored. When the wind dies there is thus a chance of power brown (or even black) outs. This can be mitigated somewhat by spreading the turbines around the province. There are 41 turbines of various sizes producing nearly 60 MW. Seems to me there are remote, unpopulated spots on the Cobequids and Cape Breton not far from transmission lines that could easily accommodate the turbines we need.


The Request For Proposals made March 12th for 130 MW power is not just for wind energy projects but for all renewable energy including biomass, land fill gas, tidal and hydro.

There is a queue for wind energy projects. This project is currently 9th in the queue, behind at least three 100MW proposals. AWPC can jump the queue if they are "ready" before their competition. Being ninth just means that eight other projects put their applications in earlier.

To be "ready" they have to have a project that will satisfy NS Power that there is public support for it.

Ha!

Thursday, July 5, 2007

Noisy turbines in Pubnico may cut off WIPPI funding

Atlantic Wind Power Corp had participated in the Wind Power Production Incentive (WIPPI) which is a grant of $10 million (of tax payer's money) over a period of nine years. Natural Resources Canada (NRC) has asked AWPC to produce a proposal as to how they can mitigate the excessive noise at Pubnico. If they cannot produce a proposal (and act on it) to NRC's liking they can cancel the grant.

Last May, NRC retained Howe Gastmeier Chapnik Limited (HGC Ltd) to conduct a noise study (again, tax payer's money) of the Pubnico wind farm. This was in response to noise complaints by Daniel d'Entremont and his family.

HGC is an engineering consultancy firm in Ontario which specializes in noise, vibration and acoustics
http://www.hgcengineering.com/

The study was conducted from 5-11 May 2006.

The study confirmed that the d'Entremont home was sometimes being exposed to higher than recommended noise levels, sometimes by as much as 13 dBA. The noise was worst when it came from the direction of the turbines and when the wind was light.

HGC used noise level criteria from the Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE). MOE uses higher threshold levels than the World Health Organization.

When the winds were too light for any turbines to operate (< 5m/s) the d'Entremont home was observed to show a sound level of 30dBA.

The MOE criteria for turbine noise are 40dBA at "cut in " wind speed of 5m/s up to 53dBA at a wind speed of 11m/s. At higher wind speeds, the sound of wind in the trees etc is supposed to mask turbine noise. (Not many leaves on the trees in winter!).

Sound levels at high wind speeds (49dBA at 9m/s) were just barely compliant.

Using methods of the CONCAWE* noise assessment protocol, predictions can be made for worst case scenarios. HBC concluded "that the predicted 49dBA level could be as high as 54dBA at the d'Entremont residence" under certain conditions.

*
Conservation of Clean air and water - Europe