Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Still no news

One really does have to wonder what is going on between NSPI and the various wind energy companies that have made their applications to provide NSPI with power.

It is now two months past the deadline that NSPI gave for announcing the "winners" and still only one project has been announced (Point Tupper in Cape Breton).

What is the hold up?

Or maybe that's the problem .... someone is being "held up".

What is the advantage to NSPI or these energy companies to delay making their announcements?

If everything is fine, all parties involved are happy, what is the delay for?

It really is very frustrating, not just for the people involved (or not) in the Pugwash project, but for the many more people around the Province who also want to know what may be coming to their neighbourhood (or not).

All we know is that 3G at Higgins Mountain/Rodney and Cape Breton Power will not be part of this RFP (but may be in the next one).

There are 25 companies who are on the interconnection queue http://oasis.nspower.ca/documents/GIP_Queue.pdf offering a total 1348MW power. All but two are wind energy projects. None has dropped off the list since October 2007 when a 50MW project in Antigonish County disappeared. That is a lot of people keeping quiet. When you consider how many people must be intimately involved in each project and multiply that by 25, that is a LOT of people keeping mum.

There is, of course, a lot at stake too, and if confidentiality is the tipping point, then one can perhaps understand the thundering silence.

The only changes to report on the queue is that the status of each project eventually changes from Impact Study Agrmnt tendered by customer to Impact Study Agrmnt Complete. As of today there is only one project left to get to the "complete" status. February 5th report had four, January 21st had five and December 5th had 17.

Does this mean that we are just waiting for this last project to be finalized? This project (#128) is in Cumberland County and is 17th in the queue. It has requested interconnection point L-6536 (Amherst area) since April 2007. Project #149 turned up in July requesting the same interconnection point. As of today's report, #128 now requests interconnection L-6535 which is also the interconnection point for project #45 (5th in the queue). The only other (potentially) shared interconnection point is in Pictou for projects #86 and #115.

Whether any of this jockeying for position is anything to do with the delay in informing the public as to where we may or may not be seeing wind turbines, is anyone's guess.

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Minister demands explanation for windmill collapse

The Copenhagen Post
25 February 2008

http://www.cphpost.dk/get/105852.html

The climate minister will begin an investigation into two separate cases of Vestas wind turbines collapsing within the past week

The climate minister, Connie Hedegaard, is calling for an investigation to determine the cause of two violent wind turbine collapses in Denmark in the past week.

Both of the windmills were produced by Vestas, and Hedegaard's request to the Energy Board comes after other breakdowns both here and abroad have been reported in the past two months.

'The problems with the turbines abroad have had to do with poor maintenance, and if that's the case here, then I expect a clear report on how we can ensure this problem is rectified,' Hedegaard told Berlingske Tidende newspaper.

Her comments come on the heels of the government's new energy agreement ratified by parliament last week, which calls for the country to have 20 percent of its energy produced by sustainable sources by 2011.

In first of the two collapses, near the city of Ã…rhus, a 10-year-old windmill began spinning out of control during high winds. A recording of the explosion-like collapse shows one of the wing blades breaking off, casting debris into the three other wings and shearing the 60- metre tower nearly in half.

Vestas itself will also now conduct an internal investigation to determine why the wind turbines have been breaking down.

'We've still got about 35,000 wind turbines across the globe that are operating fine,' said Peter Wenzel Kruse, Vestas's spokesperson. 'But they're not infallible. We're doing what we can and learning from our mistakes.'

Farmer Keld Boye, who lives in Vig where the latest incident occurred on Sunday, was clearly shaken by the wind turbine's implosion.

'I drive my tractor and my wife rides horses out there,' he said. 'Just think if we'd been out there when it happened.'

A recording of the collapse can be seen on YouTube.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3FZtmlHwcA


~~~~~~~~~~

There are Vestas turbines in use throughout the Maritime region, including Pubnico and Elmira, PEI and are planned for Pugwash.

Sunday, February 24, 2008

Wind turbine not as great as it seems

To the Editor;

I was just going through the Feb. 15 issue of the Dartmouth-Cole Harbour Weekly News when I saw the picture of the moose with the windmill in the background on page 6.

While it is a fact that this is one of the area's few wind turbines and that they may be popping up throughout HRM, as a resident that lives near this wind generator, I would invite you to come and stay at my place for an evening when the wind is blowing and you can hear for yourself the noise that this ill-placed, and poorly designed wind generator makes.

I suspect you would not want one anywhere near your place after that experience.

The picture, which appears to have been taken on a nice calm day, alludes to a clean form of power generation, but no one seems to take into account noise pollution.

The house that is attached to this noise generator has never been lived in by the builder, and most likely won't be. Who would want to live next to this kind of racket?

Although I agree wind power may be a good alternative to burning fossil fuels, these generators need to be properly regulated when installed in populated areas.

It would truly be sad if your readers see that photo and decide to just install a wind generator regardless of the negative impact on the neighbours, as has been done here.

The other sad fact is that HRM requires a permit to erect one of these units, but when there are problems with the installation, as is the case here, HRM says they have no control as there are no regulations in place to follow.

In conclusion, I would sure like to see the editor do a follow up to this photo and publish an article explaining some of the pitfalls that the local residences, and the Cow Bay Moose have observed from his prime vantage point.

Wind power is a good thing, provided it is done properly and with due consideration given to the residents. This generator could be coming to a site near you and you will not be impressed, I assure you.

Bill Falconer

Cow Bay Road

Mixed reviews for wind power

IT WAS ALL celebrations in Point Tupper at the announcement that Renewable Energy Sources Ltd. is building its first wind farm in the area.

The company’s CEO, Larry LeBlanc, told Matt Draper of the Reporter in Port Hawkesbury that the wind and concentration of industry in the Point Tupper area make it an ideal place for a wind farm.

If all goes as planned, Mr. LeBlanc said, the 11 wind turbines could be generating power by November, 2009.

Not far away across the Strait, a wind energy company from Ontario is looking to set up five or six windmills in Canso by May.

Invenergy is completing the environmental regulatory process and looking at sites in the Glasgow Head and Spinney Hill areas.

Company director Mark Bell told Andrew Rankin of the Guysborough Journal that municipalities and private landowners could earn $3 million in lease and property tax revenue from the project.

As well, the company plans to hire three people locally to maintain the windmills.

While one can appreciate the economic and environmental benefits of wind power, residents of four communities in Eastern Kings County, P.E.I., wish they had asked some tough questions.

Low-frequency noise from the wind turbines at the Eastern Kings Wind Farm has forced two families to move. Kevin and Sheila Bailey, and their son and daughter-in-law Dwaine and Dodi Bailey, left Elmira seven months ago and moved to nearby communities.

Problems started a year ago when the turbines began operating. The family members had headaches and ringing in their ears.

"My idea of noise is a horn blowing or a tractor — it disappears," Sheila Bailey told Janet MacLeod of the Eastern Graphic in Montague.

"This doesn’t disappear. Your ears ring. That goes on continuously."

"People who came to our house would stand in the yard, and their ears would pop," added Kevin Bailey.

For Dodi and Dwayne Bailey, the breaking point was when their son started waking up three and four times a night with night terrors.

The two families didn’t get any help from the provincial government so they borrowed money for the move.

"There are no rules and regulations on windmills," Paul Cheverie, chairman of the Eastern Kings Community Council said. "The more we get into it, the more we realize we jumped the gun."

He said when the wind farm was proposed, residents accepted information from government at face value.

"We were told the windmills are coming, and you don’t want to make too many waves."

Now, he wishes the community had taken a more active role before the wind farm went up in the centre of four communities.

"You can’t point fingers, and we don’t blame anyone," said Mr. Cheverie. "Now, there’s a problem, let’s try to fix it."

Thursday, February 7, 2008

Creststreet to sell stake in Pubnico power project

Winds of change blow in

Atlantic Canada’s largest wind farm is up for sale.

Creststreet Power and Income Fund LP of Toronto, a significant owner of the $50-million wind farm in Pubnico Point, Yarmouth County, wants to sell its share of the development in response to the federal government’s decision to eliminate the tax benefits of trusts.

"The change in the federal income trust rules doesn’t allow trusts to grow," said Derren Newell, Creststreet’s CFO. An independent board of directors of Creststreet has set up a special committee to conduct a "strategic review" of the income fund’s two wind energy projects in Quebec and Nova Scotia, which have a total of 47 wind turbines and power generating capacity of 84.6 megawatts. Mr. Newell said the new tax rules come into effect in 2011, but the board is looking at selling the assets while renewable energy is a "hotly traded commodity" that will make sense for the unitholders of the income fund.

"The committee is looking at maximizing unitholder value," he said.

To help in the review, the committee hired CIBC World Markets Inc. and Davies Ward Phillips Vineberg.

The Harper government passed legislation last year to start taxing income trusts at corporate rates.

The proposed rules will apply a new tax on the money distributed to shareholders by newly formed income trusts and tax some of the income at corporate rates. These new rates started for trusts trading after October 2007. But existing trusts such as Creststreet were given a four-year transition period, ending in 2011. PPWF Management Ltd., Creststreet’s partner in the Pubnico wind farm and its operator, is a local firm owned by four Nova Scotians and headed by lawyer Charles Demond.

Creststreet has been a "good partner" and expects any transaction to be completed by the end of this year, said Mr. Demond, president of Atlantic Wind Power Corp., a wind developing company.

The Pubnico wind farm has 17 turbines, has been generating electricity since 2005 and sells directly to Nova Scotia Power through a long-term-power purchase agreement.

Creststreet’s recent quarterly results show that for the first nine months of 2007, Pubnico Point’s production was eight per cent below the independent engineer’s projection, compared with seven per cent the previous year.

The lower production is being blamed on lower wind speeds, according to the Creststreet report.

Friday, February 1, 2008

Jacques Whitford report to UNSM

The Jacques Whitford report for the Union of Nova Scotia Municipalities was released on Monday and can be found at http://www.unsm.ca/Wind%20Turbine.html

On a quick read, it appears to be fairly well rounded and covers most concerns and issues. Of course, no one is going to be 100% pleased with it, and that is addressed in the report in that the authors recognise that this is a starting point.

There is a review of some printed/reviewed studies on turbine impacts, a comparison as to how other Municipalities/countries have dealt with turbines, options for policy approaches and a suggested model for future bylaws.