Saturday, October 27, 2007

IRQ latest

The most recent IRQ http://oasis.nspower.ca/documents/QUEUE_Oct25_2007_000.pdf now posts the Pugwash site status as "Impact Study Agrmnt tendered by customer"

All sites below Pugwash on the list have the same status as Pugwash with the exceptions of:
  • Higgins Mountain (Feasibility study complete)
  • 70MW Cumberland County (Interconnection request valid)
  • 10MW Richmond County (Feasibility study in progress)
  • 50MW Halifax - steam turbine (Interconnection request valid)
#79 in Antigonish has dropped off the list.

The six projects ahead of Pugwash are variously listed as "generator interconnection agreement tender" (#8 Guysborough), "Impact/optional study in progress"or "feasibility study complete".


Tuesday, October 23, 2007

NS Power - Interconnection Request Queue

We are still waiting for an announcement from Nova Scotia Power Inc (NSPI) as to whose applications towards their Request for Proposals (RFP) have been accepted. This morning I finally got a direct response from NSPI simply saying they do not "have any further information to provide at this time, as the formal evaluation process is not yet complete".

However, after fixing a computer glitch, I have found some interesting information from their most recent Interconnection Request Queue (IRQ).

There have been some changes since I started printing off current IRQs, which I now see appear to be updated every two weeks or so. So far, I do not see where older reports are archived.

I was given copies for March 30th and May 7th and, since finding the correct site, now have reports dated Sept 19th, Sept 27th and Oct 16th (http://oasis.nspower.ca/documents/QUEUE_Oct16_2007.pdf).

March 30th's IRQ had 23 sites offering 1459 MW of power. Pugwash site (ID# 56) listing for 60 MW power and status "Feasibility Study in Progress" and 9th in the queue.

May 7th has 32 sites offering 1887 MW

(August 31st -
closing date for RFP for 130 MW power)

Sept 19th lists 34 sites offering 1917 MW. Pugwash site status: "Feasibility Study Complete" and now 8th in the queue.

Sept 27th lists 34 sites offering 1870.4 MW. Pugwash site now listed as offering 34 MW power. (Property where 9 turbines were planned was sold).

Oct 16th lists 26 sites offering 1398 MW. Pugwash site status: "Interconnection Request Withdrawl Pending"

All the sites that have dropped off the October list since September were previously listed as having status "Interconnection Request Withdrawl Pending". There were others with the same status in September but are now listed "Interconnection request Valid" (Higgins Mountain), "Feasibility Study Complete" (ID#46, Colchester Co, ID# 84 Pictou Co)) or "Impact Study in Progress" (ID# 67 Annapolis Co).

The only other sites that have downgraded from "Feasibility Study Complete" to
"Interconnection Request Withdrawl Pending" is one in Colchester County (ID# 82) and one for Amherst (ID# 128)

In May, the first 18 sites in the queue are listed as "Feasibility Study in Progress" or "Complete" and all but site #100 (which was 21st and is now no longer listed at all) were listed as "Interconnection Request Valid". Many of these have since dropped off the list or are now listed "
"Interconnection Request Withdrawl Pending".

What all this means is not entirely clear. The definitions used by NSPI seems to have changed somewhat over time.

What it
looks like is that the Pugwash site is no longer being offered to NSPI. This could be for any number of reasons, but it does not necessarily mean the project has been abandoned. It could just mean they are looking for a different customer - one which is not so fussy about where they get their power and how it affects the local people

~~~~~~~~~

It is quite a convoluted process to find this queue list. A long time ago I was given the impression that this was not publicly available. It is, but you need to know how to find it.

To find current IRQs go to the NSPI site http://www.nspower.ca then do a search for "OASIS". Click on the first search result: "
Nova Scotia Power - About NSPI - Transmission & Distribution - Grid Interconnections" which takes you to
http://www.nspower.ca/about_nspi/t_d/grid_interconnections.shtml Look at the menu on the right and click on "Open Access Same Time Information System (OASIS)" The menu on the left has "System Reports and Messages" The next page middle section headed "System Reports" has "Generation Interconnection Queue" listed at the bottom. That opens a .pdf file with the current IRQ (http://oasis.nspower.ca/documents/QUEUE_Oct16_2007.pdf). In an attempt to avoid this long route in, I tried going backwards and then on the IRQ link again. This only took me back to the previous IRQ (Sept 27th) but not to the most recent.



Sunday, September 23, 2007

today's Halifax Daily News

N.S. goes green, but at what cost?
In remedying one problem, we shouldn't ignore signs we're creating another

David Rodenhiser
The Daily News

Wind energy will be an important part of Nova Scotia's cleaner, greener future. But in the rush to set up giant wind-powered turbines to fight global warming, we shouldn't discount growing evidence that they can significantly harm the health of their neighbours if built too close to homes.

Premier Rodney MacDonald's government and Nova Scotia Power are eager to show themselves taking action to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. They've embarked on an aggressive campaign to see the number of turbines operating in the province grow from 40 to more than 250 by 2013.

Their public-relations goals don't justify giving short shrift to the potential health hazards of what's being called "wind turbine syndrome."

Theories about what's causing the condition - including low-frequency vibrations and sound too low for humans to hear called infrasound - are tough to wrap your head around. That plays into the hands of governments and businesses that want to ignore the issue.

After all, if you can't hear a sound, how can it hurt you?

Well, you can't see ultraviolet light, and it can hurt you plenty.

Daniel d'Entremont, his wife Carolyn and six children know the terrifying truth of living next to a wind farm. They started experiencing problems in early 2005 after Atlantic Wind Power installed 17 massive turbines near their home in Lower West Pubnico. The closest tower is little more than 300 metres from their home; all 17 are within 1.6 kilometres.

"Immediately, we noticed ringing in the ears," d'Entremont said. "The children began acting differently. Their behaviour changed. They weren't doing well in school. Things like that. My wife developed high blood pressure."

Over time, it got worse. Carolyn began experiencing blurred vision. One adult son would go blind in one eye or the other for a few minutes at a time. It would clear up, then after a day or two it would happen again. Some mornings when getting out of bed, the same son would have trouble convincing his legs to move.

"I get this pulsating feeling in my chest - a feeling I don't like, but I can't get rid of," d'Entremont said. "I can't shake it off, unless I get away from the turbines."

In February 2006, the d'Entremonts moved to Carolyn's parents' home 30 minutes away. Their problems resolved, some quickly, some more gradually, although Carolyn's blurred vision hasn't completely cleared yet.

The d'Entremonts never wanted to leave their house, which they built in 1982. But d'Entremont, a former fisherman who now works part-time at Wal-Mart, said they can't live there anymore. They haven't found anyone willing to buy it.

"Nobody in his right mind will move here," he said.

Nina Pierpont - the pediatrician, brain specialist and evolutionary biologist who named wind-turbine syndrome - has studied the d'Entremont family's case. She said the d'Entremonts are victims of an industry that tries to discredit or diminish complaints about noise, infrasound and health problems.

"The current approach of the wind industry is to deny that the problems exist and to do nothing about them," Pierpont said.

The industry relies on acoustics consultants, who base their conclusions on engineering principles, as opposed to audiologists and physicians who consider the effects of sound and vibration on the human body.

Pierpont said wind turbine syndrome is very real, and can cause a host of problems including insomnia, headaches, dizziness, unsteadiness, nausea, exhaustion, anxiety, anger, irritability, depression, memory loss, eye problems, tinnitus and problems with concentration and learning.

There may not be just one sole cause of the syndrome. It affects some people, but not others. It may have to with the configuration of individual homes, or the geology beneath them, Pierpont said.

"It's unclear whether it's infrasound or the vibration getting transmitted through rock... Certain people, houses, geological structures, whatever it is causes there to be particularly bothersome forms of noise or vibrations."

Receptors in our extremities that sense vibration and the stretching of muscles respond to inaudible infrasound. Those receptors are tied in neurologically with our sense of equilibrium. Equilibrium can impact balance and vision. Additionally, infrasound can also stimulate the production of the stress hormone cortisol, which can cause high blood pressure.

Pierpont, who practises in rural New York about 30 kilometres from the Quebec border, is one of a number of doctors researching health problems caused by wind turbines. She intends to publish her study in six months and establish a clinical definition of wind turbine syndrome.

Pierpont recommends turbines be erected at least two kilometres away from the nearest home. In Nova Scotia, only four municipalities have bylaws governing turbine setbacks. The common standard is just 500 metres. That's less than the distance from Halifax City Hall to Spring Garden Road.

Tuesday, provincial Energy Minister Bill Dooks announced his department will help the Union of Nova Scotia Municipalities hire a consultant to develop best-practice guidelines for wind-turbine bylaws.

"We're very serious about putting towers in the right place," Dooks said. "We want to make people who live in their communities comfortable about this."

It's crucial that they fully consider the human health impacts, but I'm not optimistic. The Energy Department's website includes no discussion of health concerns and places great faith in the wind energy industry. In fact, for Nova Scotians seeking more information, it links to industry websites.

One department official I spoke with Tuesday claimed infrasound fears have been disproved, and referred me to industry research conducted by engineering consultants.

Environmentalists don't seem worried about wind-turbine syndrome, either. The need to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions has created an atmosphere where it's tantamount to sacrilege to raise concerns about turbines. Complaints are dismissed as NIMBYism.

Remember, though, governments and business rejected the science of climate change for decades, producing their own reports in rebuttal. We're seeing the same reaction on a smaller scale to warnings that wind turbines are injuring their neighbours.

Have we learned nothing? In trying to remedy one problem, we shouldn't ignore signs we're creating another.

David Rodenhiser thinks the energy minister should move his family into Daniel d'Entremont's house for a year, then consider policy.

~~~~~~

http://www.hfxnews.ca/index.cfm?sid=64760&sc=93

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Land availability

It is our understanding that wind energy companies were supposed to have secured land lease agreements before they make their application to NSPI.

The land owner that AWPC had planned on putting the nine most easterly turbines (#19 - 27) never signed the lease agreement. This land is not, nor will ever be, available for wind energy development.

It seems other local land owners are being approached by AWPC for land lease agreements.

Does NSPI know this?

Has the environmental assessment included these sites?

What is going on?


Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Holding our breath

Applications to Nova Scotia Power Inc (NSPI) for request for Proposals (RFPs) were due by August 31st.

Everyone - proponents, land owners and local residents alike - are holding their breath, waiting to find out who's projects have reached NSPI's short list. This list is to be released fairly soon. The final list should be released later in the fall.

Some proponents have put in multiple applications, some have grouped multiple projects in one application.

Rumours abound as to who has applied for which projects, or if they have deferred to the next phase of RFPs.

We are told that NSPI is very sensitive to controversial proposals. It is a private company which, we are told, would prefer to avoid any conflict.

We (Gulf Shore Preservation Association) have sent letters to the Premier, the Ministers of Environment and Labour, Energy, Tourism, Municipal Relations and Economic Development and to NSPI. AWPC, CAWF, CBCL and Cumberland County Municipality have been sent copies. Included in these communications have been copies of letters of opposition from large community groups. There are over 1,100 paper petitions signed and 270 online versions. The paper petitions are in the last stages of being collated.

The opposition to this particular project is made crystal clear.

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

Dutch turbines going offshore

The story below comes from Monday's Globe and Mail. The original story is found at the link:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070903.wdutchwind0903/BNStory/Science/home

The comments section is very interesting and worth a visit, even though it turns into a wind vs nuclear discussion.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dutch adding more wind turbines

Reuters

IJMUIDEN, Netherlands — There is no shortage of wind in the densely populated Netherlands, but there is a shortage of space and in a nation that likes its houses small and its gardens cosy, opposition to wind farms is immense.

That is why a new Dutch wind farm is being built so far out to sea that it is barely visible on the horizon, reducing the visual impact of its 60 turbines to virtually nil while at the same time harnessing higher offshore wind speeds.

Offshore wind farms are likely to appear more and more frequently off European coastlines as governments seek to increase their use of renewable energy without angering their citizens by placing giant turbines on their doorsteps.

The €383-million ($549-million Canadian) Q7 wind park development, 23 kilometres from the Dutch North Sea coast, is the farthest offshore wind park anywhere in the world, and its developers Econcern and Eneco Energie say a further five to 10 such wind parks will likely follow in the next few years.

"Q7 will contribute enough electricity for 125,000 households, but it is also a learning process. We are learning how to build these wind farms, how to organize the supply chain, and how to manage and operate them," said Bernard van Hemert, one of the wind farm's engineering directors.

"Most campaigns against turbines are based around the noise and the visual impact, and these have been reduced by going offshore. It is more expensive to do it here than to do it on land, but we have all agreed we don't have enough space on land," Mr. van Hemert said.

Blessed with shallow sandy soils around their coastline, Dutch engineers say the foundations for the turbines can be hammered 25 metres into the ground in just a matter of hours, although there are myriad other challenges.

The proportions are breathtaking. The turbines extend about 98 metres from the ocean, with three sharp narrow blades, each 40 metres long.

It is hoped that when they start rotating in early 2008 they will cut carbon-dioxide emissions by 225,000 tonnes, helping the Dutch to meet a target of 20-per-cent renewable energy use by 2020.

Tricky logistics

The turbines are so massive that they can be transported only by sea and there is only one factory in Europe which can weld and construct the 4.5-metre-diameter piles, which must be first driven into the sea to form the base of the turbines, Mr. van Hemert said.

"It is a huge logistical operation that requires lots of space. There are only a few crane vessels that can handle those huge structures and hammer them down.

"But bringing up the cables is the most challenging for all offshore wind projects."

Expert divers are helping to fit the electrics.

Developers have also had to ensure that the wind park is well away from busy shipping channels.

"Studies in the United Kingdom have shown that there can be some radio interference but in the situation we have here it is completely safe and there is no risk of confusion or reduced visibility for vessels."

Jim Mollet, chairman of a Dutch group campaigning against wind energy acknowledges off-shore wind farms have some benefits over land-based wind turbines.

"They can be a better solution. But the problem is people tend to believe they are an entire solution. We think the vast sums spent on wind farms would be better spent on research and innovation in other energy sources."

Wind farms cannot generate the sheer amounts of energy the continent requires with cost or space efficiency, he added.

Monday, August 27, 2007

Man killed after wind tower collapses


The photo shows the collapsed wind turbine tower. Photos courtesy of Brian Hulke

By KATU Web Staff

NEAR WASCO, Ore. - A giant wind turbine tower collapsed Saturday in Eastern Oregon, causing a worker to fall to his death and another man to be injured.

The man killed is from Goldendale, Wash., while the second man is from Minnesota, according to Deputy Geremy Shull of the Sherman County Sheriff's Office.

The man from Minnesota was at last check listed in serious but stable condition at Mid-Columbia Medical Center in The Dalles, Shull said.

He did not release the names of the men.

The incident happened about 4 p.m. at a wind farm about six miles east of the town of Wasco in Sherman County, Shull said. Portland-based PPM Energy owns the wind farm but Florida-based Siemens Power Generation manufactured and owns the wind turbine tower that collapsed.

Melanie Forbrick, a Siemens spokeswoman, said three people were at the site when the accident happened, two of whom were Siemens Power Generation employees and a third a contractor.

Shull said the worker killed in the incident was at the top of a turbine tower when the support column holding the turbine buckled about halfway up and toppled over. Forbrick said the injured man was inside of the tower at the time while the third worker, who escaped injury, was at the base.

She said the turbine had been in operation for 500 hours and the workers were doing a routine inspection.

Forbrick said federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration officials were on site Sunday investigating.

"We are very saddened by this event and our sympathy goes out to the families and the workers as well," Forbrick said.

Forbrick said she did not know how the height of the turbine. Bonneville Power Administration documents from last year said the turbine towers would stand 263 feet high and reach about 400 feet with blades included.

The Klondike III wind project, located in the wheat fields near Wasco, is expected to generate 221 megawatts of electricity when it's completed in late 2007, said Jan Johnson, a spokeswoman for PPM Energy. PPM is using 44 Siemens 2.3 megawatt wind turbines and 80 General Electric 1.5 megawatt wind turbines.

- The Associated Press contributed to this report.


http://www.komotv.com/news/local/9383316.html